I will be updating these rankings either today or tomorrow. Please chime in on what changes need to be made.
Here are the rankings following the Stanford Invitational. It's possible that I could have a glaring omission below so please let me know if I missed anybody worthy.
Boys
1) De La Salle NCS Division I
2) Bellarmine CCS Division I
3) Carlmont CCS Division I
4) Davis SJS Division I
5) Campolindo NCS Division III
6) Yreka NS Division IV
7) Jesuit SJS Division II
8) Del Campo SJS Division II
9) Maria Carrillo NCS Division II
10) Rocklin SJS Division II
11) Bishop O'Dowd NCS Division III
12) St. Joseph Notre Dame NCS Division V
13) Homestead CCS Division I
14) St. Francis, Mt. View CCS Division II
15) Placer SJS Division III
Honorable Mention (20 teams in alphabetical order)
I will add 20 more teams that are mentioned in the comment section below. Please include why they deserve to be mentioned in this section or perhaps should be in the top 15.
San Ramon Valley NCS Division I
Girls
1) Davis SJS Division I
2) Campolindo NCS Division III
3) St. Francis, Sacramento SJS Division I
4) Bella Vista SJS Division II
5) Aptos CCS Division III
6) San Lorenzo Valley CCS Division IV
7) Gunn CCS Division I
8) Whitney SJS Division II
9) Monte Vista NCS Division I/Monta Vista CCS Division I
10) Maria Carrillo NCS Division II
11) Menlo Atherton CCS Division I
12) St. Mary's Berkeley NCS Division IV
13) Amador Valley NCS Division I
14) Del Oro SJS Division III
15) Bishop O'Dowd NCS Division III
Honorable Mention (20 teams in alphabetical order)
I will add 20 more teams that are mentioned in the comment section below. Please include why they deserve to be mentioned in this section or perhaps should be in the top 15.
Granada NCS Division I
Again, comments are welcome. Any teams missing?
Here are the rankings following the Stanford Invitational. It's possible that I could have a glaring omission below so please let me know if I missed anybody worthy.
Boys
1) De La Salle NCS Division I
2) Bellarmine CCS Division I
3) Carlmont CCS Division I
4) Davis SJS Division I
5) Campolindo NCS Division III
6) Yreka NS Division IV
7) Jesuit SJS Division II
8) Del Campo SJS Division II
9) Maria Carrillo NCS Division II
10) Rocklin SJS Division II
11) Bishop O'Dowd NCS Division III
12) St. Joseph Notre Dame NCS Division V
13) Homestead CCS Division I
14) St. Francis, Mt. View CCS Division II
15) Placer SJS Division III
Honorable Mention (20 teams in alphabetical order)
I will add 20 more teams that are mentioned in the comment section below. Please include why they deserve to be mentioned in this section or perhaps should be in the top 15.
San Ramon Valley NCS Division I
Girls
1) Davis SJS Division I
2) Campolindo NCS Division III
3) St. Francis, Sacramento SJS Division I
4) Bella Vista SJS Division II
5) Aptos CCS Division III
6) San Lorenzo Valley CCS Division IV
7) Gunn CCS Division I
8) Whitney SJS Division II
9) Monte Vista NCS Division I/Monta Vista CCS Division I
10) Maria Carrillo NCS Division II
11) Menlo Atherton CCS Division I
12) St. Mary's Berkeley NCS Division IV
13) Amador Valley NCS Division I
14) Del Oro SJS Division III
15) Bishop O'Dowd NCS Division III
Honorable Mention (20 teams in alphabetical order)
I will add 20 more teams that are mentioned in the comment section below. Please include why they deserve to be mentioned in this section or perhaps should be in the top 15.
Granada NCS Division I
Again, comments are welcome. Any teams missing?
44 comments:
Granada girls can crack the top 10 once they get Megan McCandless back.
Where has McCandless been? She had a great track season.
Marin Academy is on the rise and San Rafael seems to peak well most years
Can anyone explain why St. Francis is still ranked behind Homestead? They beat them at Stanford without one of their top 3 runners.
San Rafael would need to step it up
Monte Vista (NCS) girls. Starn just had a bad race at Stanford it looks like. And their usual #3/4 was their 6 there, but its just one race. They have wins at Monte Vista Invite, did well at Ed Sias and Nike DLS.
B.O.D. over St. Joes? Really?
The "glaring omission": Arcadia Boys Team.
Awkward...
it's norcal only.
Awkward....
Did the BOD guys have a bad race at stanford because they didnt score that well
Yet again the St. Joes love fest continues....
By the way, where's Michael Wang of Acalanes?
Bell beat De La Salle soundly in the power merge. So take your pick at who is #1
That is correct but head to head in the same race, DLS came out on top. Power merges are great but no races have over 1000 athletes.
However you look at it, it's very very close and when they face each other again, either team could win.
DeLaSalle beat Bellarmine straight up - who cares about the merge.
SRV boys Div I deserve some mention for finishing first at the MV Invitational and Scott Bauhs along with respectful finishes at Lowell (4) and Stanford (7). SRV will be in the hunt at the NCS Championships in Nov
The NXN qualifiers care about the merge at State. So I think some people do care.
DeLaSalle is a better team at the moment than Bellarmine. Their top 3 are better than Bellarmine's top runner. Bellarmine's depth is phenomenal, but they need better performances to be able to improve their ranking. Also, the merge by NXN is only the top teams at the state meet, not the entire field as done in the Stanford Meet which clearly aids Bellarmine's depth.
I think your rankings for Girls is good at this point. But will definitely be fluid going forward.
Good point according to the results St. Francis beat Homestead yet they are still ranked below them..
Who cares. At the end of the season the merge will sort it all out. Even though you all don't like the merge.
SJS Girls - Davis, St Francis, and Bella Vista girls I think are all competing at the upcoming Bronco Invite at Willow Hills this weekend . . . that should sort things out a bit.
I'm curious about Anonyomous 9:55 PM
s comment about "SJND Lovefest". Do you think that the SJND, which took Stanford Div V places 1 through 4 with two varsity runners out with injuries, is overrated? Or have they perhaps been underchallanged at the early meets? Note Gabe Arias lost to Adrian Goltra at Ed Sias in a true photo finish, showing matching speed against one of the top runners; the rest of the team (again missing 2 varsity runners) did well too. The Murphy twins are definitely just getting better!
Just saying, any kudos to SJND are justified by their speed, depth, and determination.
Seems like St. Francis Mountain View Girls should be somewhere on this list given their performance at Clovis and that they were ahead of other ranked teams in the combined list at that meet. Especially true noting that the combined list is in error missing their #5 runner which moves them even higher.
I think davis usually doest field their varsity at that race.
At which race?
at the bronco invite
Is Odowd division 3 or 4? Didn't they run in Dv4 at Clovis? Have to be one of the top team if D4.
Bishop O'Dowd is Div. III.
http://cifncs.org/sports/cross_country/files/13CCdiv9-12.pdf
Isn't St. Francis in Division 2 in CIF, but they ran the Division 3 race? There were only 4 divisions at Clovis so don't think they were meant to match CIF divisions.
Clovis had x large, large, medium and small divisions and meet management placed the teams so some d2 teams like st Francis and Los altos were in the medium division and other D2 teams (larger D2 teams mostly from southern section) were in the large division
Clovis divisions are always based upon the previous year's CBEDS. So, for this year the 2012 numbers were used. Also, O'Dowd raced in the Championship race.
O'Dowd girls for sure need to move up.. 9th overall at the meet..
Albert,
So why did they run in D4 at Clovis and won the girls event? There was a D3 race too.
http://www.clerkofthecourse.com/clovis13/race-3.php
This is from the entry information for the Clovis Invitational.
http://clovisxc.com/invitational/meetinfo13.pdf
Check out the second paragraph for an explanation.
Despite a solid top 3-4, it doesn't seem like Homestead has a 5th guy that can match compared to schools like St. Francis. Also I'd like to nominate Aptos boys for a honorable mention, considering they were the 3rd norcal team at crystal springs behind bellarmine and carlmont. Just putting it out there, I don't go there or anything, but I'm a bit impressed compared to their recent rankings
I would put Lynbrook and St. Francis ahead of Homestead based off of Clovis with Lynbrook's killer top 3 and St. francis is just better. Los Altos and Los Gatos honorable mention
Just a bit of warning about the power merge comparing times from Clovis D4, D3, and championship races (early morning) to D1 and D2 races (early afternoon). Temps in the morning were very favorable (high 50's), but they got into the low 80's by afternoon.
I heard 95 degrees by afternoon, but who's counting. A Berkeley High parent was there and told me he could see the difference in times (and in the freshness of the runners). Approx 20 degrees hotter by the time D1 ran.
Davis girls will NOT field a team at Bella Vista meet on Saturday. Next race is Mt SAC
It was not 95 degrees at Clovis. It was 78, I was there. Not that it didn't feel hot but if you have been in the Central Valley when it is really 95 you would certainly know. Still a 20 degree difference though as it was 58 for D3, probably mid 60's low 70's for the Championship race.
I love the coaches who post on here posing as "fans." No one just hangs out at XC meets unless you are a parent or athlete. And on that rare chance they are a fan there is no chance they have inside info. You guys crack me up!
When are the new rankings going up?
I beg to differ. I am neither a parent of an XC runner, a HS runner or a current coach, but I do go to races to watch as a fan and have lots of friends that are coaches (parent friends as well) and although I don't know the inside scoop on all teams, there are some teams that I do know about. And, I also post with a name.
hank
I don't know what 8:39AM is talking about. I am not a coach or parent, but I am a fan of high school XC as are three of my friends that I run with.
I don't understand what he's objecting to...I didn't see anything very controversial in any of the posts.
Post a Comment