The following is by El Camino HS Cross Country coach Jason Jimenez.
Feel free to comment or add your thoughts in the comment box below.
I took the top teams with the top 5 returning runners from
Sections. If a team did not have a top 5 returning, I used JV times.
If they had no JV times, I used frosh/soph times for frosh/soph boys
who I think might be able to be a top 5 runner for their team. This
was easy because a lot of the best frosh/soph runners had run the 5k
course before so I could get an idea of what each team's top 5 would
end up being.
Obviously, we don't know about the surprises and my
rankings do leave out teams who could not field 5 runners. And some of
these teams will likely be a factor later in the year (see Woodcreek
D2, for example). Some ones I'm not sure about are Granite Bay (Walt
Lange from Jesuit says they will be good so...) and El Camino - who
might be moving up to Division 2. Ok here they are...
Boys D1-3
**Woodcreek, Fairfield and Grace Davis seem to be out of contention at
this point in the season but who knows what can happen this summer.
(Overall Rank/School/Predicted Returning Section Team Time)
D1
1 Davis 85:16
5 Modesto 89:01
7 Kennedy 89:29
11 Sheldon 91:47
D2
2 Oak Ridge 86:30
3 Jesuit 86:46
4 Del Campo 88:31
6 Pleasant Grove 89:01
9 Rocklin 90:07
10 Ponderosa 90:50
12 Granite Bay 91:56
D3
8 El Camino 89:37
13 Del Oro 92:42
14 Placer 93:20
15 Union Mine 93:41
--
Jason Jimenez
El Camino High School
Head Coach Cross Country and Track and Field
Sunday, July 13, 2008
SJS Pre-Season XC Rankings
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
You can now view all the entrants plus their performance mark from the section qualifier for this weekend's CA State Track and Field ... -
One more bump. Please list below athletes that you feel belong on the lists below. One more trivia question. Who is the runner ... -
Below is the schedule for the 2013 Cross Country season. If you see any errors, additions or can confirm any dates, please email me at alb...
-
Central Coast Section Results: http://www.rtspt.com/events/cif/2017Meets/ccsxc17/ Sac-Joaquin Section Section Finals: http://timerhub....
-
Just added: Info for Ghebray Invitational on September 22nd. With one extra Saturday in September next year, I started to hunt down the d...
-
Bold meets are confirmed for 2014 season. Non bolded dates are from 2013 season. August 2014 8/22 Ryan Bousquet Memorial Run at Yorba Reg...
-
I will start with one: “Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.” — Tom Fleming What...
-
If you are an athlete and you have a question about race strategy, training or anything else that is pertinent to Track & Field and/o...
-
I will continue to update this list throughout the year. Please feel free to add others in the comment section below. I know I do not hav... -
I am very sad to report that Bob Shor passed away this morning after battling illness for the past few year...
6 comments:
Great job with the rankings. When do you think you will post the NCS DIII rankings? And what about indivual rankings. Who do you think is the best in the NCS?
Well Div. III is next and I will try to post those by the end of this coming week.
I will also have the top 10 individuals in NCS (boys and girls) posted once the team rankings are done.
would it be worth it to rank NCS Div.IV and Div. V too [individual and team wise], though there are barely any of those mind-blowing runners in those divisions (at least none that most of us know of)
Take it from a former Div. V runner the competition is just as hard and just because we do not have a bunch of "fast" runners does not mean we should be slighted.
Thats very true. Everyone out there is working just like everyone else. Just because some may not have as fast of a pr as someone else or because they are in a smaller division, dosnt mean they dont deserve a ranking or mention.
Div 4 and 5 do deserved to be ranked obviously. We are not trying to slight anyone. But as competitive as one might think these divisions are, when you considered them at their section levels, they do not often compare to the upper divisions (usually 1-2-3).
Post a Comment