Monday, November 13, 2006

NCS Rankings before Meet of Champions



Division I
Girls - (Top 2 teams advance to state meet):
1. College Park
2. Castro Valley
3. San Ramon Valley
4. Granada
5. California

Boys – (Top 3 teams advance to state meet):
1. College Park
2. Castro Valley
3. San Ramon Valley
4. Liberty
5. Deer Valley

Division II
Girls - (Top 4 teams advance to state meet):
1. Carondelet
2. Arroyo
3. Montgomery
4. Santa Rosa
5. Washington

Boys - (Top 3 teams advance to state meet):
1. Petaluma
2. Montgomery
3. Eureka
4. De La Salle
5. Santa Rosa

Division III
Girls - (Top 4 teams advance to state meet):
1. Maria Carillo
2. Campolindo
3. Las Lomas
4. Miramonte
5. Redwood

Boys - (Top 4 teams advance to state meet):
1. Maria Carrillo
2. Acalanes
3. Campolindo
4. Redwood
5. Las Lomas

Division IV
Girls - (Top 3 teams advance to state meet):
1. San Rafael
2. Piedmont
3. Arcata
4. St. Mary's Berkeley
5. Moreau Catholic

Boys - (Top 3 teams advance to state meet):
1. St. Mary’s Berkeley
2. Piedmont
3. San Rafael
4. Sir Francis Drake
5. Arcata

Division V
Girls - (Top 4 teams advance to state meet):
1. Crystal Springs Uplands
2. University
3. College Prep
4. Marin Academy
5. Lick Wilmerding

Boys - (Top 4 teams advance to state meet):
1. College Prep
2. University
3. Lick Wilmerding
4. Berean Christian
5. Crystal Springs Uplands

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

So, Al, how do your mid-season individual rankings hold up now that we are approaching NCS? I have seen lots of "Boy" talk but not much on the Girls.

Just a curious Mom.

Albert Caruana said...

Looking at my pre-season rankings for the individual girls, there are some obvious changes with an influx of talented freshmen. Both Division I, II and possibly IV races could be won by freshmen. As in the past, many freshmen girls have made a huge impact on their teams but this is one of the better classes of girls in recent memories. It should make for some fierce competition in Track.

Anonymous said...

Division IV, Allie Maher from Arcata?

I will have to look her up.

BTW awfully heady stuff to have your kid noticed as "one of the most improved runners in NCS". Thanks for the vote!

Curious Mom.

Anonymous said...

How come Eureka and Montgomery are faster than de la Salle?

Albert Caruana said...

Eureka, Montgomery and De La Salle are all pretty close and that should make for an interesting Division II race on Saturday. I picked the two teams ahead of De La Salle because Eureka returns a lot of experience from last year'srace and Montgomery was impressive in their league final staying close to Maria Carrillo.

We'll see on Saturday...

Anonymous said...

For everyones information. Saint Mary's girls sat out their number four runner at league due to an injury. Also, the Piedmonts Boys team sat out their number three runner at the league meet. Mixes things up a bit.

fuel tank said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
fuel tank said...

I think that De La Salle is cheated in these Division II rankings. They should be at least number 2, and they aren't that far off Petaluma. I think that come NCS De La Salle will surprise some people.


fuel tank

Popular Posts