Courtesy of the Northern Section Website:
What do you think is the toughest standard for 2011?
Thursday, July 15, 2010
2011 State Track and Field Championships "At-Large Standards”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
You can now view all the entrants plus their performance mark from the section qualifier for this weekend's CA State Track and Field ... -
One more bump. Please list below athletes that you feel belong on the lists below. One more trivia question. Who is the runner ... -
Below is the schedule for the 2013 Cross Country season. If you see any errors, additions or can confirm any dates, please email me at alb...
-
Central Coast Section Results: http://www.rtspt.com/events/cif/2017Meets/ccsxc17/ Sac-Joaquin Section Section Finals: http://timerhub....
-
Just added: Info for Ghebray Invitational on September 22nd. With one extra Saturday in September next year, I started to hunt down the d...
-
Bold meets are confirmed for 2014 season. Non bolded dates are from 2013 season. August 2014 8/22 Ryan Bousquet Memorial Run at Yorba Reg...
-
I will start with one: “Somewhere in the world someone is training when you are not. When you race him, he will win.” — Tom Fleming What...
-
If you are an athlete and you have a question about race strategy, training or anything else that is pertinent to Track & Field and/o...
-
I will continue to update this list throughout the year. Please feel free to add others in the comment section below. I know I do not hav... -
I am very sad to report that Bob Shor passed away this morning after battling illness for the past few year...
6 comments:
I think this reflects how in the last few years many of the top girls at the state level have been focusing on the 3200 rather than the 1600 (however, competition is still strong in the 1600).
I think it reflects that the heat and wind effected the 1600 times (and a few other races) more than races that happened after sun down (like the 3200). Some of the sprints were aided by the wind, but the longer distances (scheduled earlier in the meet) were definitely effected negatively. Those were some tough conditions for the 1600s!
I also think that although Clovis is an amazing venue, the weather is going to continue to be a big factor there most of the time.
Good points.
Very disappointing the Boys 1600M at-large time rose by over 2 seconds from 4:14.49 in 2010. Is this solely based on actual times run at the State Meet? If so, there will definitely be a few runners next year that will benefit from this year's terrible and less-than-inspiring Boys 1600M effort at State. I really don't think the slow 1600M final had anything to do with the heat. It was a bunch of boys running defensively and playing right into Geydeon's strength. The most disappointing final race I have seen in the three years I have been attending the State Meet.
The at-large marks are calculated based on the state meet trials times (average 9th place mark in the trials). Thus, the slow 1600 boys final had no impact on the at large mark.
Thanks Ernie.
Post a Comment